Rankings
Bettors need at least 50 settled public bets and one pick in the last 365 days for the selected sport. Past simulated results are not a guarantee.
Rankings use simulated winnings for entertainment and comparison—not real-money gambling results. Eligibility and rank can change as picks settle.
| Rank | Bettor | Simulated winnings | Last 30 days | Yesterday | Record | Win % | Top sport | Upcoming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Chuyysossa Phoenix | Simulated $10,705 | -$70 | -$2,000 | 91 - 52 - 0 | 64% | AFL | 0 upcoming |
Simulated results for entertainment. Not real-money gambling.
This leaderboard is a performance screen, not a popularity list. Kingpin ranks eligible experts from graded public picks and sport-specific winnings, then updates the order as results settle. Use the cards above to compare sample size, recent results and the sport where each expert has performed best.
Experts must clear Kingpin’s minimum graded-pick requirement and show positive AFL winnings in the applicable evaluation window. Losing and break-even records do not qualify for the ranked list.
Look beyond rank alone. Review the number of settled picks, win-loss record, recent winnings and the prices attached to individual selections. A small hot streak is less informative than a larger transparent sample.
A high rank describes past graded performance; it cannot guarantee the next pick. Follow experts within a preset budget, compare prices, and stop if betting is no longer entertainment.
Yes. Rankings update as public picks are graded, so losses, wins and eligibility changes can move an expert up or down.
No. The ranked list uses graded pick and winnings criteria rather than follower counts or sponsored placement.